[jdom-interest] RE: Memory and Speed problems with SAXBuilder
mark.wilson at wilsoncom.de
Sat Mar 1 08:57:11 PST 2003
I would also be very interested in a JDOM-Version for JDK 1.4.1 with the
StringBuffer-bug workaround. I´m also having major performance problems
handling relatively small (ca. 800K) files.
Is there any possibility of a beta 9 release? Sure would make life alot
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jdom-interest-admin at jdom.org
> [mailto:jdom-interest-admin at jdom.org] On Behalf Of Laurent Bihanic
> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 11:57 AM
> To: malachi at tremerechantry.com
> Cc: JDOM-interest
> Subject: Re: [jdom-interest] RE: Memory and Speed problems
> with SAXBuilder
> Malachi de AElfweald wrote:
> > I can't downgrade the JVM. How would I upgrade to a newer
> version? CVS?
> Yes, unless Jason decides for a quick code freeze for a beta9.
> Jason, what's your current view on the beta9 planning ?
> > Malachi
> > On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 10:47:27 +0100, Laurent Bihanic
> > <laurent.bihanic at atosorigin.com> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> Malachi de AElfweald wrote:
> >>> Worst performer was SAXBuilder (which I originally used
> because we
> >>> were building from
> >>> an InputStream). Also, SAXBuilder was the ONLY one that
> required the
> >>> huge amount of
> >>> heap space.
> >> You are probably using JDOM beta8 with JDK 1.4.1. These two are
> >> incompatible due to the memory leak bug in StringBuffer
> introduced in
> >> JDK 1.4.1.
> >> For more information, please see
> >> http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4724129.html
> >> Sun does not plan to fix this bug until JDK 1.5 (Tiger).
> >> To fix this problem, you have 2 solutions:
> >> 1. Stick to JDOM beta8 but downgrade to JDK 1.4.0 or 1.3.1
> >> 2. Stick to JDK 1.4.1 and upgrade to the latest JDOM which
> includes a
> >> workaround for the JDK bug.
> >> Laurent
> To control your jdom-interest membership:
uraddr at yourhost.com
More information about the jdom-interest