[jdom-interest] JDOM for production

Dennis Sosnoski dms at sosnoski.com
Fri Oct 19 09:53:07 PDT 2001


Hi Alex,

Your Workbench sounded interesting, but only after I looked at it in detail did I
realize that it's Windoze only. You might want to mention that in your announcements,
especially since people generally expect Java products to be cross-platform.

Thanks!

  - Dennis

Alex Rosen wrote:

> We use plenty of JDOM in our newly-shipping IDE, and it works great. There's
> only one current bug that we've had to deal with, and the workaround is
> simple (see
> http://www.servlets.com/archive/servlet/ReadMsg?msgId=151691&listName=jdom-i
> nterest). Early on (6-12 months ago) we ran into a couple of bugs, which we
> fixed and submitted patches for. Now they're not bugs anymore. You can feel
> more confident using beta open-source software, because you can always fix
> bugs yourself, instead of having to beg for a new release from the vendor.
>
> [Shameless plug: SilverStream eXtend Workbench makes J2EE and Web services
> development easy, and it's free for a limited time. Check it out at
> http://software.silverstream.com.]
>
> Alex
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: jdom-interest-admin at jdom.org
> > [mailto:jdom-interest-admin at jdom.org]On Behalf Of Dmitry Tumanov
> > Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:44 AM
> > To: jdom-interest at jdom.org
> > Subject: [jdom-interest] JDOM for production
> >
> >
> > I am considering of using JDOM for a production product. JDOM
> > is still beta,
> > and it may be hard to sell that to my boss. Is it ready for
> > production? What
> > arguments could I use to back it up.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Dmitry
>
> _______________________________________________
> To control your jdom-interest membership:
> http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yourhost.com




More information about the jdom-interest mailing list