[jdom-interest] Using NanoXML and JDOM
    Paul Libbrecht 
    paul at mathweb.org
       
    Mon Oct  1 17:00:20 PDT 2001
    
    
  
Sir Dennis,
Funny, i had encountered your benchmarks recently when discovering a 
slight  bit of dom4j.
Now the definitive thing that's missing in all these is to change the SAX 
parser (though it would add a new dimension).
Did you not use some profiling tool for the memory allocation ??
I mean, this should, ideally, measure only the space and time for the 
objects and not for the classes, even classloading time.
At least for speed, I saw an enormous difference between Saxon's AElfred 
and Xerces (this was the important thing in this case).
Paul
On Mardi, octobre 2, 2001, at 12:17  AM, Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
> http://www.sosnoski.com/opensrc/xmlbench/results.html
    
    
More information about the jdom-interest
mailing list