[jdom-commits] CVS update: jdom
cvs at jools.org
cvs at jools.org
Mon Jan 7 01:32:15 PST 2002
Date: Monday January 7, 2002 @ 4:32
Author: cvs
Update of /home/cvspublic/jdom
In directory jools.org:/tmp/cvs-serv4364
Modified Files:
build.xml
Log Message:
Integrating patch from Jeff Turner <jeff at socialchange.net.au> so that
the JDOM versioning will make more sense. Below is his email.
-jh-
Currently, any 'jdom.jar' built from CVS will claim that it is beta 7,
when one interrogates it via 'java -jar'. This effectively renders the
whole version reporting system useless, as a jdom.jar from 6 months ago
look exactly like one produced yesterday.
This may be a symptom of a deeper misunderstanding. Is "beta 7" a point
in time, or an ongoing period of time (about 6 months)? Are we "in the
7th beta", or has it been and gone?
I'll assume a beta is a "point in time", as this is what users believe,
and the website indicates ("JDOM Beta 7 was released!").
In which case, some terminology is needed for where JDOM is, now.
The attached patch adopts the <next version>-dev approach. Once applied,
'java -jar jdom.jar' will report:
JDOM version 1.0beta8-dev, built January 6 2002
Copyright 2000-2001, Jason Hunter and Brett McLaughlin
...
Does that sound reasonable?
If so, the implication is that when beta 8 arrives, the distro builder
must update the version flag to "beta 8", do the build, then immediately
change the flag to "beta 9-dev".
===================================================================
File: no file build.xml Status: Needs Checkout
Working revision: 1.27 Mon Jan 7 09:32:15 2002
Repository revision: 1.27 /home/cvspublic/jdom/build.xml,v
Existing Tags:
jdom_prefilter (revision: 1.25)
jdom_1_0_b7 (revision: 1.23)
jdom_1_0_b6 (revision: 1.15)
start (revision: 1.1.1.1)
jdom (branch: 1.1.1)
More information about the jdom-commits
mailing list